Resolution to approve an amendment to the Development Plan for the Stonebridge PUD
Recorded in the minutes as “Resolution to approve an amendment to the Development Plan for the Stonebridge PUD. Community Development Director John Shaw stated the developer has submitted a development plan…”. Passed 5–0; Yes: Duer, Evans, McFadden, Mertz, Stewart.
What this means (Planned unit development (PUD)): A custom zoning district with rules written for one project, instead of the standard district rules.
How each member voted
| Official | Vote |
|---|---|
| Scott Duer | Yes |
| Josh Dunwoody | Not in the record |
| Jerry Evans | Yes |
| Jayme McFadden | Yes |
| Julie Stewart | Yes |
More from the record
Recorded in the minutes as: “8. Resolution to approve an amendment to the Development Plan for the Stonebridge PUD. Community Development Director John Shaw stated the developer has submitted a development plan amendment to modify the overall layout of the Stonebridge subdivision. Motion: Moved by Evans”. The minutes add: “A waterway bisects the property north/south through the development. That waterway was recently re-classified as “Water of the U.S.” and as a result thresholds for disturbing the stream and surrounding area have limited the developer’s ability to execute the plan as previously approved. To minimize disturbance the plans have been revised to reduce the number of stream crossings from 3 to 2.”
Motion as recorded: “Moved by Evans”.
Source Full minutes for the whole May 4, 2026 meeting, p. 1 (saved copy) · All votes at this meeting